Un commentaire intéressant de l'article :

"Any engineer (or, frankly, teenager avoiding a state porn ID law) should be able to argue to a court that IP address prove NOTHING. VPNs exist. Open wifi networks exist (they shouldn't, but they do). IoT networks exist, and are often unknown to the owner/operator.

Without proof positive of the infringement (e.g. a warrant that allowed them to seize computer equipment, and positive forensic detection of the songs in question) they have zero case.

This is an intimidation tactic, plain and simple -- hoping to steamroll people into settling, and to cow the ISPs to do the RIAA's dirty work for them.

As this has been in the news for quite a long time, the evidence is LONG GONE. Any subscriber to that service has, I am sure, deleted the evidence. Even if they haven't, it is going to be awfully hard to PROVE in court that an MP3 found on their computer was, in fact, "pirated." (I mean, if they are dumb enough to still have the torrenting software installed, then that's on them I guess. But otherwise, a "pirated" mp3 scrubbed of meta data is no more identifiable than a "legal" one)"